Playing the Race and Religion Card in the Warsi Case

Oh, heaven help us.

Having concerns about Baroness Warsi's expenses/accommodation claims, as well as an individual named Abid Hussain who is a relative and whom went on trip to Pakistan trip with her, not to mention allegedly failing to declare an interest in a spice manufacturing firm,  is all motivated by racism and sexism.

Apparently it's part of some racist, xenophobic, sexist, Islamophobic, plot to oust her from a position of influence because she's a Pakistani heritage Muslim.

It is said that a number of groups - wonder which ones - have rallied to her defence.

Labour MP Karl Turner has written to London Police regarding the case. What a racist, he must be motivated solely by prejudice. Shame on him.

Warsi ticks so many PC checkboxes she's obviously untouchable. She'd only need to lose a leg and become a lesbian to manage a clean sweep.

Muslim. Female. Pakistani. She has obviously never committed any wrongdoing in her entire life. To think that she has, to call for an investigation, cannot be anything but a hate crime no matter what evidence there may be against her.

She shouldn't have to abide by the same standards as others, ticking those minority boxes must make her exempt. To even investigate her is blatant hatred.

It's racist, sexist, and Islamophobic, to think otherwise. Isn't it always when minority stands accused?

The Big Issue, Benefits, And Eastern Europeans

After celebrating recently publishing its 1,000th edition, the co-founder of the Big Issue, John Bird, has come out on the offensive and in favour of Romanians, Lithuanians, and Eastern Europeans selling the magazine.

"We were contacted by Romanian groups who said these people are coming here and have no legitimate means of income. Let them sell the paper, they said, because then their children stay in school. They'll gain a foothold".

What an excellent idea, let's encourage them to come here and gain a foothold. One trusts the Big Issue will be picking up the bill for all of the schooling (and other) costs associated?

Didn't think so.

Will they be paying to house these people?

Nope, a court ruling in January decided that a Romanian woman was entitled to £160 a week housing benefit because of her status as a self employed Big Issue vendor.

Just sell a few magazines on the street, the British taxpayer gets to foot tbe bill.

The Big Issue sells around 125,000 copies a week - and it is believed that about a third of those selling the Big Issue are Eastern Europeans.

To round off the idiocy, John Bird remarks that "I'm an ex-offender and I'm conscious that if you don't give someone an alternative to wrongdoing, they will do wrong. In many ways we are about crime prevention".

There is already an alternative, the best alternative of all - they should remain in their own country, they should not be made into Britain's problem and burden.

We are told time and time again that immigration benefits Britain. Quite how selling a few magazines as a shortcut on to the benefits system and uses of scarce public resources benefits us, or why we should encourage more of this to happen, remains a mystery.

BNP In the Sunday World

A number of readers have messaged/mailed asking about this story, so we're reprinting here purely for information purposes.

Sites such as the British Democracy Forum have been alive with speculation regarding the Sunday World (Northern Ireland) running a story about Nick Griffins financial shenanigans.

Here's their story, click to enlarge : 

Hat tip to the pal and fellow patriot who sent us the photo, you know who you are :)

Sloppy Journalism And Misleading Headlines as the Daily Mail Gets its Obligatory Racism Story of the Day

Never let the truth get in the way of a good headline, even if it is at odds with the content of the story itself, seems to be the motto of the Daily Mail.

"Every black man I met where England will play has been beaten up by racists: How one journalist was stunned by the bigotry in the Ukrainian cities hosting our games", that's their headline today.

Of course it's a chance to bang on about neo-nazis, racism, bananas (they always seem to turn up for football), and the horrendous life of blacks in the Ukraine. Nobody thinks to ask why, if it's so horrendous, they bother going to live there.

Note the "every black man" has been beaten up by racists in the headline though.

By the time we plough through the story, and hear the shocking tale of how one man hid in a shop before his pals chased off the evil nazis, we arrive on a line :

"Almost every black man I approached in Donetsk last week told me they had suffered a racist physical attack. And all had been verbally abused – several times".

So, every black man you met had been beaten up in the headline, yet a bit later on it's almost every one. Almost all is not every one, not unless there's been a big change in the meaning.

We then really get to something interesting, our black journalist says :

"As I travelled around Donetsk,  no one made obscene gestures or monkey noises. No one made any remarks about bananas, or said anything untoward.

Yet I had a nagging sense of unease, of a sort I have never felt in London, or indeed in any other Western European city".

So...nothing happened! She was uneasy it would, but it didn't. What a hotbed of racism it must be, the lack of racism must surely prove racists are a cunning bunch.

Very sloppy stuff DM, a cheap way to get your headline about racists for the day.

Complain About Negligent Hospital Treatment? You Racist!

One might have expected nurses to show a little sympathy for 50 year old Sandra Hynes.

Going into hospital for a routine operation to treat her acid reflux, she ended up with a punctured lung, a two week stay, and on morphine to deal with the pain.

Whilst there an untrained nurse left her in agony after failing to insert a needle into her hand or provide oxygen.

She was told off when orally administered morphine caused her to hallucinate.

The final straw came when a nurse began feeding a blind patient in the bed next to her soup that was so hot it left her blistered and screaming.

She told the nurse that she should have checked the temperature - common sense, any nurse should have known that.

One staff nurse Maureen Nwadike, the superior of the black nurse who fed the blind woman soup so hut it burned her, descended on Sandra Hynes and told her "You're racist".

No shock, the nurse with the soup was black, so is staff nurse Maureen Nwadike.

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital have since apologised.

"I was called a racist for complaining about a lady  getting scalded, and because no one was able to fix my morphine over the whole weekend. It was a horrific experience" said Sandra Hynes.

The amazing response from Chelsea and Westminster Hospital senior nurse Sian Davies?

"...you described how Nurse Maureen Nwadike accused you of being racist. The behaviour you described will not be tolerated and is not acceptable. I will be monitoring her communication skills"

Not acceptable. Monitoring her communication skills. Oooh, one bets nurse Nwadike is quaking in her boots - and already preparing the racial discrimination claim should any action be taken against her.

Just play that race card, it's good for all occasions. Be incompetent, useless at your job, burn a patient, and nothing much will happen if you can yell racism. It's the whites fault for complaining about you, it has to be racially motivated.

Every time it's always the same. No matter the failings, the cry always goes up that there are only issues or complaints 'cos they is black.

Mohammed's Dominating Crimestoppers Sex Offences Appeals

Glancing around Crimestoppers website earlier (available in dozens of languages!) one couldn't help but notice something standing out on the list of most wanted for sexual offences.

Just look at the image, you can doubtless work it out for yourself.

Topping the bill are four charming looking enrichers.

From left to right, top to bottom :

Mohammed Maqsood, charged with indecent assault and now hunted for failing to appear in court.

Sohail Ahmed, charged with sexual assault and failed to appear in court.

Mohammed Akmal, charged with sexual assault on a female under 14 years of age and failed to appear in court.

Mohammed Rafique, bailed over allegations that he sexually assaulted a 7 year old girl and subsequently vanished. He has family in Pakistan, but may well be in or around Birmingham.

One is aware Mohammed is one of the most popular boys names now, but really to such an extend that it should make up 3 out of the first 4 leading sex offender appeals on Crimestoppers?

Is it a Mohammed thing, a Muslim thing, or a Pakistani thing, that manages to see a small section of imported society constantly featuring in crimes relating to sex and children?

Some moron will probably decide to point out that Crimestoppers are racist or Islamophobic for showing the truth about our enrichers, but we're sure our readers can draw their own conclusions from the number of Mohammed's on the wanted for sex crimes list.

Crimestoppers actually makes for an interesting read now and again - look at those mugshots and witness diversity in action, Britain enriched by the imported criminal. There sure are a lot of them making crime their own domain.

Get Complaining About Prejudice and Discrimination

Every one of us can doubtless agree that the current obsession with racism, prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, and all the rest of it is an utter insanity.

Anyone remember the Jungle Drums fiasco*? The outcry when a sports commentator said coloured instead of black? All the bitching over that 'spot the transvestite' advert?

Idiot claims by hysterical neurotics crazed with the idea of objecting to everything on the most spurious grounds are accorded all kinds of attention and serious consideration by officialdom.

Now, we can whine about it all day here - or, we can decide that if we can't beat them, join them.

Of course it's insane, petty drivel that makes people either snigger at the stupidity or hold their head in their hands in despair, but there's a point to where I am going with this.

All kinds of bodies take this madness seriously. It costs them time and money to investigate.

They might not give a damn about discrimination/stereotyping/racism against whites, but they do have to investigate it and at least give a response else they are admitting outright that the system is biased against whites.

We don't even just have to complain about things involving whites either. Complain about bloody everything, develop that PC obsessed, curtain twitching, neurosis that wants to see prejudice everywhere.

I remember Nostradamus mentioning the Confused car insurance advert in a comment on the British Resistance. What horrific racial stereotyping. Get complaining!

Why? Because complaints cost them time and money.

Use the entire wretched system against itself. Demonstrate the utter absurdity of the whole damn thing. For the trouble of 5 minutes emailing here and there, someone on the other end is going to waste their time (and sadly most likely our taxpayer money, but there's no avoiding that) on pursuing the complaint.

Burden them down with complaint after complaint. Smell racism, discrimination, and stereotyping, everywhere.

Whether it be a complaint to the Press Complaints Commission, the Advertising Standards Authority, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, a local council, or whoever, once the complaint is made the onus is on them to devote their efforts to investigating it.

We can complain about the system all we like - it gets us nowhere. Instead, we can use the system to fight the system.

The whole system is wrong, but it's a system we are currently stuck with, and we have to work within it and use it to our advantage. We'll not have an impact at all by moaning amongst ourselves, we need to take up their own weapons and use them against the enemy.

It costs us nothing save for a few minutes of time here or there, it doesn't need any organisation whatsoever, anyone can do it whatever party they are in (or not), and it will give the operators of the PC apparatus a headache if enough people do it and keep on doing it.

*Although good as an example, one would have to be judicious in making sure some poor old lady didn't end up persecuted as a result of complaints.